News for Seattle's Ballard neighborhood and beyond

My Ballard header image 2
 

Development Update March 16: Subdivisions and an 85-unit block

Posted by Danielle Anthony-Goodwin on March 16th, 2017

One application and two decisions make up today’s update from the City of Seattle’s Department of Construction and Inspections as posted in the Land Use Information Bulletin.

Application:

1726 NW 60th St

Screen Shot 2017-03-16 at 2.50.53 PM

A Land Use Application has been submitted to subdivide one development site into three unit lots. The construction of residential units is under Project #6528468. This subdivision of property is only for the purpose of allowing sale or lease of the unit lots. Development standards will be applied to the original parcel and not to each of the new unit lots.

Decisions:

2027 NW 65th St

Screen Shot 2017-03-16 at 2.51.50 PM

A Land Use Application has been approved to subdivide one development site into four unit lots. The construction of residential units is under Project #6488327. This subdivision of property is only for the purpose of allowing sale or lease of the unit lots. Development standards will be applied to the original parcel and not to each of the new unit lots.

5512 17th Ave NW

Screen Shot 2017-03-16 at 2.53.04 PM

A Land Use Application has been approved to allow a 7-story structure containing 85 small efficiency dwelling units, 3 apartment units, 2 live-work units and 1,700 square feet of retail at ground level. No parking is proposed. The existing structure will be demolished.

Appeals of the above decision must be received by the Hearing Examiner no later than 3/30/2016.

Tags: Ballard   Share

6 reader comments so far ↓

  • 1 Bob // Mar 17, 2017 at 6:30 am

    …7 stories…no parking…the rental contract better have a clause stating that you are NOT allowed to own a car. Parking in Seattle is a joke.

  • 2 Biff Sparky // Mar 17, 2017 at 7:59 am

    .Hey Bob, take this 1 step further and ask these progressive turds what they’re all waiting for. Seems to me these folks have to wait for their government issued marching orders and THEN are happy. Why not take the plunge and demand buildings where ZERO autos are accepted? They then can wear yet another badge or pin on their lapels informing the entire world they are saving it! Wouldn’t this be “progressive” Bob? As in taking action instead of incessant protesting? But then again, social engineering is so much fun. Welcome to SF North

  • 3 Profile photo of JM98107 JM98107 // Mar 17, 2017 at 8:44 am

    The seven-eleven will certainly be happy to have new neighbors and customers.

  • 4 Truth // Mar 17, 2017 at 8:54 am

    Don’t like places with no parking? Then don’t buy a place with no parking. Seems simple.

  • 5 Joe Ballard // Mar 20, 2017 at 8:17 am

    No parking = maximum profit for developers. Its not about being “progressive”….its just about profit…with complete disregard to adding to the existing congestion of crowded street parking.

  • 6 He Hate Me // Mar 20, 2017 at 1:52 pm

    Biff, there isn’t any parking in the building which means exactly zero automobiles are accepted. You got your wish already!
    If you need a place to park your car, buy or rent a place with parking. Can it get any more simple? Why do these righty tuds want to make me pay for someone else to park their car?

Leave a Comment (read our comment rules)






News from the Seattle Times




Skip to toolbar