Daily news for Seattle's Ballard neighborhood

My Ballard header image 2
 

Denny’s landmark to be demolished

Posted by Geeky Swedes on May 21st, 2008

First on My Ballard: The Seattle Landmarks and Preservation Board voted unanimously tonight that there’s no economically-feasible solution to preserve the old Denny’s in Ballard. The attorney representing the developer, John McCullough, said they are “reactivating” the approval process for their planned development, which will result in the demolition of the Denny’s.

“It’s a very sad situation,” said board chair Stephen Lee (in foreground). “It’s a bad situation to be in.” Lee said it’s the first time in his memory the board has designated a building a landmark and then not voted for controls and incentives — the next step in the landmarking process. While the old Manning’s Cafeteria remains a landmark, the developer is not restricted from demolishing it. “It breaks my heart,” said board member Christine Howard.

McCullough presented the board with 12 different options for the property. The scenario that came closest was a high-end restaurant on the site with no parking, but it still fell short, losing just over $1 million. Other scenarios looked at office, retail and even bringing Denny’s back to the building (see below). “We never even got to zero,” McCullough said.

Following the board’s staff recommendation, no one on the board disagreed with Benaroya Company’s analysis. “Nothing works,” said board member Alyce Conti, who ran the numbers on multiple scenarios. “No lender is going to lend… these people will not be able to get a loan.”

The board agreed that an outside proposal to raise the height limit on the property — which would require a change in the city zoning ordinance — was risky and should not be part of their evaluation. Conti said that even with the rezone, the property would not be economically feasible.

“We have nothing to be ashamed of,” said preservationist and Ballard resident Eugenia Woo after the vote. “We put up a great fight.” Board chair Stephen Lee — who rallied the board to preserve the Denny’s three months ago — refused to talk to the media and was overheard telling someone, “I need a drink.”

McCullough did not give a timeline for the demolition, as the permit process has not yet begun. As always, stay tuned to My Ballard for updates on this story.

Tags: Ballard   Share

  • Weeeeee! Yay! Sorry old Ballard folks but I am tired of lookin at it. :)
  • Suthii
    Can I suggest they not demolish it, but burn it to the ground so the night sky is lit up for all of Ballard to see? It'll be like Guy Fawkes, we can even throw an effigy of old Seattle on top to sound the final liberation of Ballard from squalor and despair. I’ll come dressed as a condo (all beige and earth tones), wearing my Sunset Bowl bowling pin earrings ($9.99 on Ebay), so the old Ballardites can spot me in the delirious and joyous crowds and try to run me down with their beat up pick up trucks with their 'Save the Viaduct' bumper stickers.

    Hell, maybe we can start a new annual parade in Ballard to celebrate Liberation Day.
  • Jasmine
    I'm strangely saddened by the decision. I loathe the building - it's an eye sore and a waste of land, but I'm not excited for generic condos to be slapped up in its place.
  • Ben
    Maybe if it were better economic times it could have been saved. Personally, I don't care as long as the architecture on the new development is really good.
  • Geoffret
    I was first shocked that someone tried to save this horrendous building. It sticked out like a sore thumb in Ballard. I am relieved that I will not have to see this thing every time, I drive/ride to work. I am confident that the developer will be doing something tasteful and great for our community.
  • srcsmgrl
    I wonder if Suthii even lives in Ballard or if he/she just likes to taunt us.

    I actually like the fire idea. We can use it as a community builder. I will bring the marshmallows!
  • joe
    i have to say, i'm a little dismayed by all the excitement to burn the thing down. it shows that nothing, quite frankly, can be preserved in red-hot Ballard, because property values have shot to the stratosphere. economics trumps history. which is sad, really.
  • robert
    hey s...ie-
    we will burn it only if you huff the fumes.
    ebay is printed all lower case.
  • Eric
    I'm not even a fan of the building, even though I'm a fan of googie, but I am kind of insulted by the notion that in a prospering neighborhood like Ballard, there's nothing that could go into that historic building -- on the busiest corner in the neighborhood -- and be profitable. I think it's more a matter of it won't maximize profits.

    Again, I'm not a particular fan of the building, but on the other hand, I'm not sure there's been a single condo development in Ballard in the last five years that has been an aesthetic or cultural improvement on the neighborhood. So my faith in the future of Ballard continues to slowly erode. I've lived here 15 years and actually welcome the increasing urban density of Ballard but feel like the generic architecture is slowly eroding its soul. I find it impossible to believe that a complex like NoMa will be as beloved in 100 years as the glorious buildings on Ballard Ave. (arguably Seattle's most gorgeous street). It saddens me. The Denny's building in and of itself is not a major tragedy, but it's symptomatic of one.
  • Joel
    here here Eric.
  • Bill
    Nice scoop, Swedes!
  • Joel
    Yeah, the building was ugly as hell, but it was one of the few reminders of the old Ballard that I grew up in. I know there isn't one single sentimental folk reading here, but there you have it.
  • Eric
    And I should add that whether you are a fan of the Denny's building or not, it is not soulless or generic. That alone is worth keeping it around, because the odds of something more soulless or generic replacing it are at least 99% in my thoroughly unstatistical estimation.
  • CK
    I'm kind of surprised the building couldn't be moved to another location.. set up as a community center in a park or something. In Colonial Williamsburg where I'm from this was done (moving historic buildings) to make way for development when necessary... granted they were more historic than the Dennys building, but how about in 200 years... what will be the old Ballard landmarks then?
  • M
    I'm not surprised at the outcome. My affection for the building was purely sentimental, but I recognize that sentiment alone does not grant historical status.

    My concern is around what will replace it - another shoebox condo? The main arterials into Ballard are already condo canyons - is it too much to hope for something stylish and multifunctional with a bit of historical flavor?
  • I am not a big fan of all the condo's beng built, in fact it really scares me, but I am thankful that someone in planning wasn't afraid to make a decision that is not "politically correct". Who elected those guys, the ones who tried to call that monstrosity a historical landmark. Every time I travel past that corner I think of how ridiculous our society has become when we can say "its a bad situation", or that it "breaks my heart"... to get rid of something that ugly. Pul-lease. That structure was hideous at best. Its good that it will be gone.

    srl
  • mr fantastic
    why are we limiting our options for action to either pining for the ugly, not-so-old building or fretting about the soulless shoebox that will be put in it's place? How about a third option like making demands for art/neighborhood consistency in whatever goes up there. I think we can do better than fremont did, but at least they got the developer to do something when they replaced the red door. Forcing them to have a "Googie" theme? Let's get a little creative people!
  • AkGru
    This marks the beginning of the end for Ballard's rise. A slow decline into irrelevancy will be noted by historians. A line in the sand, a tear in the fabric, a cleave in the woody flesh...

    I weep for you old Denny's building.
  • mary
    mr f - I agree with you, but I don't know how to even approach the third option.
  • I didn't love that building either, or Denny's for that matter, but it was a landmark in Ballard in the respect that when someone from out of Ballard came here, you could tell them "just past the Denny's" when giving directions. And even though I didn't go to Denny's all the time, it was great to have an all night diner close to home, not to mention a place you could take kids besides Mc Donald's.
    And whatever, condos, like we need more. Are condos really selling so well that building more is financially viable? As far as giving directions using landmarks goes, pretty soon people will be lost in the Valley of Banality.
  • Suthii
    " a place you could take kids besides Mc Donald’s."

    So simply having knives and forks is what defines a 'good' restaurant in Ballard? Hmmmm, yummy Dennys.

    "A line in the sand, a tear in the fabric, a cleave in the woody flesh… "

    So much drama over change. Where's the next line in the sand, when they turn Mike's Chili into a Italian shoe emporium?

    I've got my can of gas and matches ready, when's the celebration?
  • Duncan
    A good restaurant in Ballard, I think, is defined by the fact that internet trolls refuse to eat there.
  • Suthii
    "A good restaurant in Ballard, I think, is defined by the fact that internet trolls refuse to eat there.."

    Which is why they also get bulldozed.....go figure?
  • mary
    Suthii - you've already used the "Mike’s Chili into a Italian shoe emporium" elsewhere - yawn...
  • tj
    Money, Money Money, Another Condo, another unaffordable housing. No Parking! More expensive restraunts, Oh Boy!! Ballard is Looking more taxable everyday!! BALLARD IS RUINED!!!
  • Suthii
    "another unaffordable housing."

    To who, you? That's doesn't make them unaffordable to others. For some folks, $300-400K is affordable and I say, good for them, welcome to the neighborhood. Eventually condo owners have kids, earn more and will move on and hopefully buy homes in Ballard, keeping the community growing and thriving for years to come.

    Or maybe some people prefer boarded up businesses, trashy restaurants, bums and general squalor? It's the only way to validate their grim world views?

    "BALLARD IS RUINED!!!"

    So leave. It's a free country you know.
  • Dusty
    I guess I am confused on the term "economically feasible". Did no one mention inviting Denny's back into the buildin? It's hard to believe that having Denny's in that location for years was not " economically feasible". Did the owners really think to themselves "having Denny's here is not economically feasible, but oh well, lets keep it that way for years on end.

    Maybe the reason for letting them tear it down should have been that there is something "MORE economically feasible".
  • Suthii
    "It’s hard to believe that having Denny’s in that location for years was not ” economically feasible”.

    Unless the land became more valuable and their rents went up. What d'ya think?

    " Did no one mention inviting Denny’s back into the buildin?"

    Maybe Ballard doesn't need more junk food?
  • Duncan
    Dusty -- Suthii does have a point, though I doubt it's the one he/she is trying to make. The Denny's was doing fine financially under the old ownership, because the old owners (SMP and whomever before them) either didn't have a mortgage or generated sufficient rent revenue to cover that mortgage.

    The Benaroyas, though, dropped a ridiculous sum of money on the property. There's not a tenant on earth -- at least not that the Benaroyas could find -- that would generate sufficient rent revenue to generate a positive return on their "investment."

    "Economically feasible" means feasible for the ownership, not the tenants of the building.
  • Suthii
    "Benaroyas, though, dropped a ridiculous sum of money on the property."

    As is their right.

    It's the concept of 'ownership' that seems to rile up so many Ballardites; it's as if they expect to be paid less than they are worth at their jobs.
  • tj
    Sorry Suthii I don't make 50 to 100K a year, and able to pay a $2000 a month morgage. I lived in Ballard all my life, and I work in ballard. I had to move out of Ballard to be able to find a affordabe place to live. And to be able to keep food on the table for my Kids and My husband who has a full time job.. $300K to 500K is unaffordable for alot of hard working people, who can't afford it!
  • Suthii
    " I had to move out of Ballard to be able to find a affordabe place to live."

    I had to move out of a city I couldn't afford, but I wasn't angry and bitter at the people who could afford to live there.
  • Suthii
    "$300K to 500K is unaffordable for alot of hard working people, who can’t afford it!"

    What do you want me to do about it, sell you my home for less than it's worth?
  • Phins
    "Sorry Suthii I don’t make 50 to 100K a year, and able to pay a $2000 a month morgage. I lived in Ballard all my life, and I work in Ballard. I had to move out of Ballard to be able to find a affordabe place to live."

    *TJ, I completely respect the fact that you and your husband are hardworking, taxpayers who are raising a family and really trying hard. That is awesome.

    However, you mentioned that you have lived and worked in Ballard your entire life. The logical question I can't get out of my head is why didn't you buy that "1930's charmer on 48th and 8th" in in 1995 for $160k? You've had your entire life to scope out the market? I am sure that you had plenty of opportunities along the way. If you'd have bought a $160k house when you had the chance, a combined salary of $50k between you and your husband (which is very burger flipping territory) would suffice in present day. You being unable to afford a $300k to $500k property in Ballard doesn't warrant you calling Ballard "ruined". That's quite the bitter attitude. I bet in 10-20 years, $300k - $500k in Ballard will seem very cheap.

    News flash, buying a house/condo/townhouse is never a bad idea. Even if it the property never goes up in value (which, besides the past couple years, is extremely rare), you'll still be building equity, have protection against inflation, and eventually have the property paid in full at some point. The price of renting is always going to increase, and you're just paying off someone elses property. I bet in 10-20 years, $300k - $500k in Ballard will seem very cheap.

    I wish I would've bought $200k worth of Google when it IPO'd at $85 per share. I'd be set for life. I do not think Google is "ruined" because it is 6-7 times more expensive at ~$550 a share though.

    C'mon now.
  • gooner
    while the cost of condos is a little off topic, as a ballardite, who is on vacation in SF right now, i thought i would weigh in.

    was reading the newspaper yesterday morning and it said that the starting (not median/mean/etc) house price in SF (including condos) was 580ki. yes, starting. average was in the 800's i think. So it sucks if you can't afford ballard or anywhere in seattle. when there are other west cost cities like this, seattlle is going to seem very cheap to some.
  • Suthii
    "seattlle is going to seem very cheap to some."

    For a coastal city with good jobs, great environment, great neighborhoods (that get better every year) but limited space, it is reasonable. But prices are still going up:

    http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/364197_hous...
  • Tallman
    Suthii, just wondering what’s up with all the attacks? You’ve posted 9 times on this blog alone… expressing a very angry tone each time. It seem like you must have the last word and your option is the only right one. If you must reply try not to be so mean about it. It’s easy to be nice 

    As far as home prices it would seem everyone has an option. People make all sorts of different amounts….some make more some make less. It seems like everyone can produce some sort of statistic that backs up there point of view. Either way the one thing that is true is housing prices are going up. The days of renting a $600 apartment in Ballard are quickly disappearing as well. Many people are moving out and many new people are moving in. Things are changing.

    I did want to address one issue. Someone may have purchased a home in Ballard years ago for 100,000 to 160,000 or whatever. Even thought they may have purchased it for a low amount that does not mean they are living the good life. Because of all the recent re-zoning their neighbor’s old hose is now 6 town homes. Not a big deal but now the value of the property there home is on is worth more than the house…and the property tax on there house is $6000 to $8000 a year…That’s about $600 a month Just something to think about. Some older people have had to move because just they can’t afford to pay the taxes anymore.

    Be nice.
  • Phil
    That property was seized for $7.5 million from underneath Dennys in 2005 by the monorail project. Then ransomed off to Benaroya for $12.5 million in 2006 after the monorail predictably failed. Denny’s had paid $5,295 a month for rent in 2007 and covered the site’s $26,485 property tax bill.

    What a great scam, seize a property under the guise of eminent domain , then sell it shortly afterwards for a tremendous profit.
  • Michael
    We should change the subject to the true dilemma for all Ballard residents, new and old.

    Denny's, Manny's or whatever you may call it is not the problem, but only a boarded up structure that defines a much more pertinent predicament. We have no say.

    We bicker amongst ourselves, while our city is being drawn by outside profiteers, lawyers, and bureaucrats. I am not saying that these people and their professions are unholy but only that their interests are not to benefit our Ballard.

    If we do not want a soulless, unplanned suberbia on stilts then we should stop knit-picking the inconsequential like we're a news agency during a Presidential Election.

    Instead we should develop a system to bring our voices together in such a way that developers would be forced to listen to and learn from the community that they are attempting to profit from. Without a local system of communication and cooperation we are left as individuals while our rulers do as they please.

    Shall we develop a conversation? Does anyone have any ideas on how to set up a democracy?
  • appreciatethesaltydog
    This is great--kudos to all of you for having an opinion about this building, and development of this (and other) neighborhood(s), in general. Disagreement helps draw out the issues that are important to people, and the fact that there are many "right answers" to any problem.

    Case in point, I've heard a lot of gripe about "another condo building". Allow me to point out other sections of Ballard that have turned into block after block of six-pack townhome developments, equally generic and not likely to make historic landmark status in 50 years. These arrangments came about to quickly add housing units to the pool during the housing shortage in the late 90s. Great view into your neighbors bathroom, and nice tight driveways for your segue or smart car--that's all that can fit in the "garage". Personally, I'd rather have a few high-density condo buildings located in the urban centers of the neighborhood for empty nesters looking for a more urban experience, and young professionals who are able to live out of their car, making a 500 s.f. studio seem spacious. Hell, someday it may be my parents, or even me (assuming I'm eventually in a position to afford such a place)--great to have that option in the neighborhood.

    The fact that they may look "generic" or monotonous, well, how is that different than most other residential buildings in Ballard? Do you like the faux-stone flats over open-parking that were ubiquitous construction during the 60s and 70s? At the very least, the new condo buildings are more energy efficient than any other housing type, built with green building standards (required by city of Seattle building and zoning codes) that far surpass the single-pane windows and inefficient air conditioning units (is air conditioning in Seattle really necessary?!) that graced the Ballard Denny's/Manning's/Googie drive-by.

    Yes, it's an interesting looking building, but is that reason enough to retain something? That's almost as ridiculous as going to war to spread the word of the "Prince of Peace"...but that's another story entirely...
  • appreciatethesaltydog
    I should point out that the six-pack townhomes are an excellent way for people to get into the housing market (so, not all bad). They have their place, and if done correctly, they have the potential to add something interesting to a neighborhood.

    Everything in moderation makes for a nice dose of variety.
  • Wanda
    Here's the real scoop........

    People got lured into the Idea/value of real estate going up. Woo Hoo everyone's selling and buying like crazy and bragging about how much they sold that property for 3 times or more then they paid for it in just a few years.
    Here comes reality.....
    The value of the property went up but so did the taxes.
    Some people bought more then they could realistically afford and the bottom falls out. I mean come on. Who can really afford $2,000.00 TO $3,000.00 or more a month every month for 30 years?

    Only people who have 100% Job security, regular raises, no health health problems, never miss a day of work and never get divorced. Never get in accidents and have kids that never get sick.

    How many people fit into that equation?

    That's why the bottom falls out. But even when the price of real estate goes back down the taxes don't. That means only one group benefits long term from all this.

    In the end, everything goes so sky high taxes, utilities, rent, buying a home, medical, dental, transportation etc. that people enslave themselves.

    If you want to be free, be realistic. Live within your means and always be prepared for worst and hope for the best.
  • Unfimicit
    Buy Propecia online!
    Buy Propecia
  • 9N)'&NFb"QEh)JBQpKG(-X)(PKBfKdFb`JB b)$Fe-
    http://rihaza.2222mb.com/boat2632.html boat jR,
  • Hey fellow www.myballard.com members
    Hows everyone?

    Well I just thought I would introduce myself.
    My name is Elizabeth
    Im 22 years old..
    My favorite food is sushi
    Im a christian for life lol
    I work at Burger King
    I guess thats enough of an intro lol


    Nice to be here! Nice to meet you guys!
  • hvau htki fneqjp zprhm drzum ozkjdcg dymha
  • Golf cars and conveys are for s squaret second-hand and new, and emconfederation galvanizing motors that use batteries.
    cart golf maintenance Now days you can ascertain duty golf kits and accessories to clothes your unitary refinement and preferences. If you're ethical getting into golf cars and trolleys, a few issues you may paucity to excogitate are attribute, how affordable and twopenny they are, if they're drive acceptable, covers for them, battery chargers, motor sizes and additional bring supplies and confederation types. straight away you've understood it some consideration, you may hold a clearer notion of what you're looking for. Some people self-possessed dutyized golf convey bodies, appliance, hold, and with air bags. Hop online and get the revelation on all golf conveys and cars currently on the market. anyhow, up front you decide to do area with any demanding cast-off or practice golf convey shopkeeper, you should inspect out their retinue's unnoticed a bit. muster up out whom all they're combined with and how want they've been selling golf convey kits, replacement batteries present, covers, up and take off parts and accessories. It's not ethical up which wholejumble r is donation the biggest car-boot on galvanizing and gas golf trolleys, but it's also up who you can certainty as a consumer. Jot down the association email putting and a call slews, which is less many times present oneselfed on the comrades's ritualistic website. This way if there are questions that the website fails to present oneself, you can with the area yourself and assail c promote any and all unavoidable inquires notwithstanding prominence, price, their laying and more.
  • Picking up a consumable worn golf convey doesn't possess to get through a disband the bank. utilized golf brings can be ground that run on stimulating, gas, or soul power (deny and arrive) and can be ground reasonably priced, and also with much doll-sized garb and tear. If you over recall in it; multitudinous golf brings undoubtedly are not definitely 'acclimated to' utter much at all. time again, they were heretofore owned by the uninterested golfer who surely lone perhaps got a take place to hit the tack a few times each Summer. gather the scratch you could scrape on rental fees by owning your own golf convey.

    canada cart golf yamaha
    utilized Golf moves are also at in multitudinous strange sizes. Depending on how varied people resolve be playing, you can get a worn golf convey that can shelter more than two people in preference to of the normal one; accordingly, allowing eutterone to liberate small change on renting an additional golf move. utilized golf moves can be ground from multitudinous top Manufacturers such as EZ-Go, trounce band Car, Yamaha, and others and on, they purpose already be customized with some th extras.
  • eimvjsb uierlnca wlem ycqsur bwsxncmvl kspdhqbyw krafhsnwb
  • AlexMenshow
    Здравствуйте
    Имея небольшой опыт небольших путешествий столкнулся с проблемой однообразного освещения в Интернете информации о своём опыте отдыха - зачастую есть только рекламные описания от турагенств или хвалебные отзывы, которые пишутся на заказ этим же турагентствами.
    Пообщавшись со своими знакомыми, подсказали только один сайт (на немецком) с реальными отзывами об отелях - holidaycheck (dot) de, сайт пользуется большой популярностью, так как содержит реальные отзывы.
    Кто может подсказать СНГ-аналоги такого сайта с правдивым контентом? Хотелось завести свой блог, но понял что если нет аналогов - может сделать сразу сайт?
    Буду рад услышать Ваши мнения по этому поводу в топик или на мыло.
  • I like your guestbook. Check out my page. JsackRackModoGhost
  • While BMW’s main highlight at the 2008 Geneva Motor Show may have been flaunting the new BMW Vision
    EfficientDynamics Concept, the new 2008 BMW M3 Convertible was still stole the spotlight
    sitting there with its top down.
    More there is : 2008 BMW M3 goes topless in Geneva



    carmazda9981
  • President-elect Barack Obama delivered a speech today, January 8, 2009. Obama discussed the current economic crisis and urged Congress to act quickly in passing a stimulus bill, warning that the recession could become
    (Video + Transcript)
    Infrastructure? What is he thinking? The US has some of the best infrastructure in the world. Anyone who has traveled can see that. Only Europe has better... and not ALL of Europe. Not only that, but there are 250,000 people out of work on Wall Street, and Obama is going to hand them all a shovel? ...NONSENS !
  • A prank targeting Google has resulted in a 9/11 related symbol query of ? ¦¦ become on of today’s largest search terms.
    The symbols, showing a plane flying into the World Trade Center have been searched for tens of thousands of times or more, placing the search term for several hours in the top 10 searched for terms in the United States.
    At the time of writing it ranked at 13. Who is running the prank is unclear at this time, although we have a few ideas where it might be coming from.
    Open

    classic option for Google :)
  • 5Ob4fo hi! how you doin?
  • Madonna’s crotch area gets its share of the spotlight, and it probably catches our attention way too much. Kind of like… now: these mesmerizing leaked outtakes from Madonna’s Hard Candy shoot, which involved fishnets, what are probably thongs, lace-up boots, and what D-Listed lovingly refers to as “granny nip.” Be sure to stare at the lumps hanging over the itty-bitty thong strings. It’s very omg.
    PHOTO
    :) Good on her, I think all the bashing that goes on about her is sexist and ageist, and I hope she continues to do whatever she wants to, despite her age.
  • Ustream.tv has launched their first iPhone application right in time for the Obama Inauguration.
    The Ustream iPhone Viewing Application is WiFi only at this stage, allegedly “to ensure the highest quality broadcast,” and gives full access to Ustream.tv shows...
    READ

    it is a good app for iphone, but the app will not work on my first generation iPod touch. If it’s wi-fi only:(
  • Hi Guys!
    These are very inportant.
    Do you expect random or pre-employment drug test?
    Laboratory GCMS and preliminary results confirmation - http://www.xlar.com/lab-services-test-accessori...
    May be it helps you
  • samantacrazy
    I already found some progs at this free burners blog
  • Монтаж, демонтаж, транспортировка и перемещение тяжеловесных и негабаритных грузов.

    Качественно, профессионально, недорого.
    8 903 522-37-15, (495) 223-70-79
  • Perfect domain name www.myballard.com

    Glad to show you where is a dating website that has your safety in their priority.
    free for allgreat
    website. Visit it
    lRomanceRing: Love and Passion Ring – http://www.romancering.us
    here for you.
  • Dumbruibrabot
    To be honest with you, I don’t have the words to make you feel better, but I do have the arms to give you a hug, ears to listen to whatever you want to talk about, and I have a heart; a heart that’s aching to see you smile again.

    I congratulate you on the coming Valentine's Day

    http://rapidshare.com/files/194489099/heart-on-...
  • Information from http://gold-collection.biz
    WASHINGTON – With fewer than 500 applications and only two-dozen homeowners helped so far, lawmakers want to revamp a new program that was intended to help hundreds of thousands of borrowers avoid losing their homes.

    The changes being considered Wednesday by the House Financial Services Committee come as Congress and President Barack Obama refine the most dramatic steps yet to boost the ailing U.S. housing market. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is expected to announce a new approach for aiding borrowers and rescuing the flailing financial industry next week.

    The Obama administration wants to spend up to $100 billion in financial bailout money to help borrowers stay in their homes. Republicans, meanwhile, are expected to seek a vote later this week on a plan to have the government drive down mortgage rates to as low as 4 percent.

    The government's efforts to stem the foreclosure crisis thus far have relied on voluntary cooperation of the lending industry. The plans have not stopped a dramatic surge in foreclosures that is likely to worsen as workers lose their jobs amid a deepening recession.

    "We will have to do more — substantially more — to fix this crisis," Geithner said Wednesday.

    During the presidential campaign, Obama said banks that receive federal bailout money should be required to halt foreclosures for 90 days, but that hasn't happened yet.

    "I voted for Obama just for that reason," said Leroy Hernandez, 52, who lives outside Richmond, Va., and fears foreclosure is imminent on his home loan. "Maybe I'm just gullible."

    The company that collects payments on Hernandez's loan, Litton Loan Servicing, is owned by Goldman Sachs Group Inc., which has received $10 billion in federal bailout money.

    Litton spokeswoman Donna Marie Jendritza said Hernandez was denied a modification because he did not provide proof of his income, but added that he is welcome to apply again.

    "If proof of income is not provided, we cannot go forward," she said.

    Congress last year created the Hope for Homeowners program, which was supposed to allow 400,000 troubled homeowners swap risky loans for traditional 30-year fixed-rate loans with lower rates. But only 25 loans have been approved since the program started in October out of 451 applications, despite more than 66,000 calls to the Federal Housing Administration about it from consumers and lenders.

    Under a bill being considered by the House committee, several restrictions on the program would be lifted in hopes of allowing more people to qualify.

    Meg Burns, the federal housing official in charge of the program, testified this week that tight restrictions on who can qualify and high fees have led to the disappointing results. The bill being considered Wednesday would reduce those fees and lift some of those restrictions.

    Republicans were skeptical. "While Americans all over this country are struggling with their own mortgages, should they be forced to pay their neighbors?" said Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas. "There are basic questions of fairness."

    However, some consumer advocates argue the changes aren't enough.

    "It's not the magnitude of help that's needed," said John Taylor, president of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, a consumer group in Washington that's pressing the administration to buy up distressed loans in bulk and modify them so borrowers stay in their homes.

    While plans to assist homeowners likely will anger those who oppose subsidizing borrowers who may have acted irresponsibly, the Obama administration appears to agree that such action can help stem the financial crisis.

    "We're not going to be able to eliminate all foreclosures, but can certainly keep that number from getting out of control," said Robert Litan, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, a liberal-leaning think tank. By doing so, "you should be able to reduce some of the losses on the securities which are driving the banks under."
  • lolouiui
    http://aeterna.ru/userpost.php?glasexy&post... - домашнее порно avi
  • ansbkgz autdfc segi xncqi urzjvf ftvhuxkb omxywqeh
  • state rates morgage rates loan morgage
  • Accewactima
    Люди, кто добрый, подскажите пожалуйста сайт для поиска работы онлайн! А то уже дома задолбалась сидеть без работы((
    Извените, если не в тот раздел попала =\

READ MY BALLARD'S COMMENT TIPS AND RULES